Journal Information
Vol. 88. Issue 3.
Pages 225-231 (July - September 2023)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
2478
Vol. 88. Issue 3.
Pages 225-231 (July - September 2023)
Original article
Full text access
Prevalence of metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in patients with gallstone disease. Study on a cohort of cases in South-Southeastern Mexico
Prevalencia de la esteatosis hepática metabólica (EHMet) en pacientes con litiasis vesicular. Estudio de una cohorte de casos en el sur-sureste de México
Visits
2478
F. Roesch-Dietlena,
Corresponding author
federicoroesch@hotmail.com

Corresponding author at: Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Agustín de Iturbide s/n, Col. Flores Magón, CP 91700, Veracruz, Mexico. Tel.: 2299027565.
, A.G. Pérez-Moralesb, P. Grube-Pagolac, M. González-Santesd, F. Díaz-Roesche, A. Triana-Romerof, L. Roesch-Ramosg, J.M. Remes-Trocheh, M. Cruz-Aguilard
a Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
b Profesor de la Facultad de Medicina y Vicerrector, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Veracruz-Boca del Río, Mexico
c Anatomopatólogo, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
d Profesor de la Facultad de Bioanálisis, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
e Residente, Hospital Español, Mexico City, Mexico
f Médico en Servicio Social CONACyT, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
g Profesora y Directora, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Veracruzana, Mexico
h Departamento de Neurogastroenterología, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (5)
Table 1. Risk factors in the study population with gallstones and metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease.
Table 2. Histologic alterations found in the 136 liver biopsies analyzed.
Table 3. Anthropometric characteristics and risk factors of the study groups (group 1 [normal liver] and group 2 [MAFLD]).
Table 4. Biochemical profile of the group 1 (normal liver) and group 2 (MAFLD) patients.
Table 5. Concordance between patients with a histologically normal liver, patients with MAFLD, and conventional ultrasound findings.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Introduction

Metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and gallstone disease are entities that share similar risk factors. Numerous publications confirm their elevated frequency, but few studies have considered their prevalence and possible association.

Aims

To determine the prevalence of MAFLD in patients with gallstone disease and the usefulness of liver biopsy for diagnosing the liver disease.

Materials and methods

A prospective study was conducted on patients that underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in whom liver biopsy was performed.

Variables analyzed

Anthropometric characteristics, biochemical profile, conventional ultrasound, risk factors, and histopathologic study of the liver biopsy.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were carried out for the quantitative variables and the Student’s t test and multivariate analysis through binary logistic regression were employed for the continuous variables, utilizing IBM-SPSS, 25.0 (Windows) software.

Results

A total of 136 patients were classified into 2 groups: 40 (29.41%) with normal liver and 96 (70.59%) with MAFLD. Of the 136 patients, 71 patients (52.21%) corresponded to hepatic steatosis, 21 (15.44%) to steatohepatitis, and 4 (2.94%) to cirrhosis. Perisinusoidal inflammation was found in 39 cases (28.68%) and fibrosis was found in 10 (7.35%). The risk factors for both groups were age, diabetes, high blood pressure, and obesity. Glucose, triglyceride, and aminotransferase levels were significantly higher in the MAFLD group and conventional ultrasound demonstrated moderate concordance for its detection.

Discussion and conclusions

The results confirmed the elevated frequency of MAFLD associated with gallstone disease, justifying liver biopsy during cholecystectomy for diagnosing MAFLD.

Keywords:
Metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease
Gallstones
Metabolic syndrome
Resumen
Introducción y objetivo

La esteatosis hepática metabólica (EHMet) y la colelitiasis son entidades que comparten factores de riesgo similares. Numerosas publicaciones confirman su elevada frecuencia, sin embargo, pocos estudios han considerado su prevalencia y posible asociación.

Objetivo

Determinar la prevalencia de EHMet en pacientes con colelitiasis y la utilidad de la biopsia hepática para el diagnóstico de la enfermedad.

Material y métodos

Estudio prospectivo de pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica a los cuales se realizó biopsia hepática.

Variables analizadas

Características antropométricas, perfil bioquímico, ultrasonido convencional, factores de riesgo y estudio histopatológico de biopsia hepática.

Análisis estadístico

Se emplearon estadísticas descriptivas para variables cuantitativas y t de Student y análisis multivariado mediante regresión logística binaria para variables continuas, empleando el programa IBM-SPSS, 25.0 (Windows).

Resultados

Ciento treinta y seis pacientes, clasificados en 2 grupos: hígado normal 40 (29.41%) y EHMet 96 (70.59%) de ellos 71 (52.21%) correspondieron a esteatosis hepática, 21 (15.44%) a esteatohepatitis y 4 (2.94%) a cirrosis. En 39 casos (28.68%) se encontró inflamación perisinusoidal y en 10 (7.35%) fibrosis. Los factores de riesgo para ambos grupos fueron edad, diabetes, hipertensión arterial y obesidad; los niveles de glucosa, triglicéridos y aminotransferasas fueron significativamente superiores en EHMet y el ultrasonido convencional fue un estudio de moderada concordancia para su detección.

Discusión y conclusiones

Los resultados confirman la elevada frecuencia de EHMet asociada a colelitiasis por lo cual se justifica realizar la biopsia hepática durante la colecistectomía para establecer su diagnóstico.

Palabras clave:
Esteatosis hepática metabólica
Litiasis vesicular
Síndrome metabólico
Full Text
Introduction and aims

Metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has become one of the most frequent chronic liver diseases, with an estimated prevalence in the general adult population of 25-40%,1–4 increasing in the at-risk population to 62-84%, and whose natural progression conditions its advanced stages of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.5–7 Because of its elevated prevalence and high morbidity and mortality rates, MAFLD is considered a public health problem that not only affects individual health and the family economy, but also greatly impacts healthcare costs worldwide.8–11 One of the most important risk factors is obesity, which has notably increased in Mexico. In 2019, obesity held second place in the adult population across the globe, as well as first place in childhood obesity, with a frequency of 15.7-42.1% in the general population.12–22

Likewise, gallstone disease has a high prevalence in productive-age women and shares similar risk factors with MAFLD, such as obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and multiparity.23–28

The relation between the two entities has been reported by different groups worldwide, but information in Mexico is scarce. Therefore, we decided to conduct the present study to determine their prevalence and possible association.29–32

Our aim was to determine the prevalence of MAFLD in patients with gallstone disease and the usefulness of liver biopsy in diagnosing MAFLD.

Materials and methods

A prospective, observational, and comparative study was carried out on patients diagnosed with symptomatic gallstone disease that underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and liver biopsy, within the time frame of January 2017 and March 2020, after having given their informed consent. They were seen at private hospitals in the city of Veracruz, in collaboration with the Department of Pathologic Anatomy at the Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas of the Universidad Veracruzana. The study variables were age, sex, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), family history, and associated comorbidities (obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and number of pregnancies). The blood levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total protein, and albumin were analyzed, and the results of conventional ultrasound imaging were evaluated.

Inclusion criteria: patients of both sexes in whom hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C were ruled out and patients whose alcohol intake was below 150g/week.

Exclusion criteria: patients with gallstones, of both sexes, with positive viral markers for hepatitis B or hepatitis C, and patients whose alcohol intake was high.

Study universe: consecutive patients that underwent cholecystectomy due to gallstones.

Wedge biopsy of the liver was performed in segment 4 of the right lobe. The samples were fixed in 10% formaldehyde and underwent hematoxylin & eosin and Masson’s trichrome staining at the Department of Pathologic Anatomy of the Instituto de Investigaciones Médico-Biológicas. They were interpreted and classified according to the NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) proposed by Kleiner et al.33

Statistical analysis: the results were analyzed using the descriptive statistics of measures of central tendency and dispersion for the quantitative variables and using the Student’s t test and a multivariate analysis through binary logistic regression for the continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at a p of 0.05 and the IBM-SPSS version 25.0 for Windows software was employed.

Ethical considerations: the study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the NOM-012-SSA3-2012, and the protocol was approved by the Bioethics and Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Veracruzana in Veracruz-Boca del Río.

Results

A total of 142 patients diagnosed with gallstone disease that underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and liver biopsy were evaluated. Six of the patients were eliminated because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, leaving 136 patients to make up the study group. The mean age of the study patients was 50.85±15.28 years (range: 21-82) and there was a predominance of women (108 [79.40%]) over men (28 [20.60%]).

The risk factors found in the patients with gallstones were diabetes mellitus in 31 cases (22.79%), high blood pressure in 46 cases (33.82%), and dyslipidemia in 119 cases (87.5%); in relation to BMI, 97 patients (71.3%) presented with normal weight or overweight and 39 patients (28.68%) presented with obesity; and 48 women (35.29%) (range: 0-10) were multiparous (≥ 3 births). The risk factors in the MAFLD group were diabetes mellitus in 30 cases (31.25%), high blood pressure in 42 cases (43.75%), and dyslipidemia in 69 cases (71.88%); in relation to BMI, 62 patients (64.58%) presented with normal weight or overweight and 33 patients (34.38%) presented with obesity; 31 women (32.29%) were multiparous (≥ 3 births) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Risk factors in the study population with gallstones and metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease.

  Gallstones n=136MAFLD n=96
Risk factor 
Diabetes mellitus  31  22.79  30  31.25 
High blood pressure  46  33.82  42  43.75 
Hypercholesterolemia  48  35.29  24  25.00 
Hypertriglyceridemia  71  52.21  45  46.88 
BMI         
Normal  44  32.35  23  23.96 
Overweight  53  38.97  39  40.63 
Obesity  39  28.68  33  34.38 
Parity ≥ 3  48  35.29  31  32.39 

BMI: body mass index; MAFLD: metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease.

Based on the histologic findings in the liver biopsies, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1=40 patients (29.41%) with normal results and group 2=96 patients (70.59%) with MAFLD. The diagnoses in group 2 were hepatic steatosis in 71 cases (52.21%) (the majority of which were mild [66.20%]), steatohepatitis in 21 cases (15.44%), and cirrhosis in 4 cases (2.94%). In the patients with MAFLD, perisinusoidal inflammation was identified in 39 cases (28.68%), fibrosis in 10 cases (7.35%), and cirrhosis in 4 cases (2.94%) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Histologic alterations found in the 136 liver biopsies analyzed.

Histologic diagnosis  n=136 
Normal liver  40  29.41 
Steatosis  71  52.21 
Grade I  47  66.20 
Grade II  21  29.58 
Grade III  4.23 
Steatohepatitis  21  15.44 
Cirrhosis  2.94 

In order of frequency, the statistically significant risk factors for MAFLD were type 2 diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia; on the other hand, sex and obesity were shown to have an odds ratio (OR) of –1.0 as protective factors against MAFLD, and in relation to age in years, the mean age was significantly higher in the MAFLD group (p<0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Anthropometric characteristics and risk factors of the study groups (group 1 [normal liver] and group 2 [MAFLD]).

Parameter  Normal (n=40)MAFLD (n=96)  OR  95% CI
       
Age (years)  43.10±13.86  –  54.08±14.73  –  –  48.23-53.47  0.000b 
Female sex  34  85  74  77.08  0.453  0.159-1.293  0.132 
Obesity  20  50  71  73.96  0.338  0.156-0.733  0.005a 
Diabetes mellitus  29  30.21  8.224  1.859-36.386  0.001a 
High blood pressure  12.5  41  42.71  5.218  1.881-14.479  0.001a 
Hypercholesterolemia  22.5  39  40.63  2.357  1.011-5.495  0.049a 
Hypertriglyceridemia  15  37.5  56  58.33  2.333  1.094-4.979  0.027a 
Parity ≥ 3  14  35  34  35.42  –  –  0.520 

CI: confidence interval; MAFLD: metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease; OR: odds ratio.

a

X2 (p < 0.05), significant.

b

t (p < 0.05).

In relation to the biochemical profile, the serum levels of glucose, triglycerides, AST, ALT, and alkaline phosphatase were significantly higher in the MAFLD patients than in the patients with normal results (p<0.05); in some parameters, such as indirect bilirubin and total protein, their values were slightly higher, but not statistically significant (Table 4).

Table 4.

Biochemical profile of the group 1 (normal liver) and group 2 (MAFLD) patients.

Parameter  Normal (n=40)MAFLD (n=96)
  Mean±SD  Median  95% CI  Mean±SD  Median  95% CI 
Glucose (mg/dl)  83.68±12.05  96.00  89.82-97.53  107.47±27.44  103.00  101.91-113.03  0.001a 
Cholesterol (mg/dl)  186.45±40.26  187.00  173.38-199.52  197.30±41.26  194.00  188.94-199.52  0.163b 
HDL (mg/dl)  49.06±16.81  45.00  42.78-55.34  50.60±16.48  49.00  46.58-54.62  0.587 
Triglycerides (mg/dl)  146.07±54.16  134.50  128.75-163.40  182.22±82.54  164.00  165.49-198.94  0.004a 
Direct bilirubin (mg/dl)  0.175±0.136  0.200  0.130-0.221  0.202±0.126  0.200  0.176-0.228  0.105 
Indirect bilirubin (mg/dl)  0.654±1.509  0.400  0.151-1.157  0.464±0.192  0.400  0.424-0.505  0.064 
AST (μ/l)  25.00±11.24  23.00  21.40-28.60  32.95±18.34  28.00  29.23-36.66  0.001a 
ALT (μ/l)  33.17±23.39  27.50  25.69-40.66  59.23±38.28  48.00  51.47-66.99  0.000a 
Total protein (g/dl)  7.49±0.61  7.60  7.27-7.72  7.28±0.59  7.35  7.15-7.41  0.073 
Albumin (g/dl)  4.042±0.35  4.00  3.91-4.17  3.88±0.49  4.00  3.77-3.99  0.209 
Alkaline phosphatase (μ/l)  76.45±40.69  69.00  63.43-89.47  102.66±47.9  89.00  92.95-112.36  0.006a 

ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CI: confidence interval; HDL: high density lipoprotein; SD: standard deviation.

a

Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05), significant.

b

t test (p > 0.05), not significant.

Conventional ultrasound imaging results in the subjects with a histologic diagnosis of normal liver showed no alterations in 38 cases (95.0%) and identified alterations suggestive of MAFLD in 2 cases (5.9%), whereas in the cases with a histologic diagnosis of MAFLD, 38 cases (53.52%) were reported as normal and 33 (46.48%) were suggestive of steatosis, with a Cohen’s kappa coefficient of 0.44 and a 95% CI of 0.29-0.59, revealing moderate diagnostic concordance and only a total level of good concordance of 0.71 (Table 5).

Table 5.

Concordance between patients with a histologically normal liver, patients with MAFLD, and conventional ultrasound findings.

Ultrasound  Abnormal  Liver biopsy % Normal
Abnormal  58  42.6  1.5  0.000a 
Normal  38  27.9  38  27.9   
a

Kappa index, p<0.05, significant.

Discussion

MAFLD is a chronic progressive disease characterized by abnormal fat accumulation that presents in persons that consume fewer than 20g of alcohol daily, and in persons in whom other causes have been ruled out, such as medications, iron metabolism alterations, viral infections, and causes secondary to bariatric surgery and malnutrition. The broad spectrum of MAFLD includes simple steatosis, steatohepatitis, cirrhosis of the liver, and hepatocellular carcinoma,15,26and it has become one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease. It affects one-fourth of the world population (14-35%),15–18 with variations in different regions. The highest rates are in Western Europe and the United States, where differences between diverse social groups have been found (45% in Hispanics, 33% in Whites, and 24% in African Americans).1,5,34,35 A significant increase is estimated worldwide in the coming decades. By 2030 it is calculated to reach 24.6% in Japan, 26.2% in China, 43% in Germany, and 49% in Spain.36–38 Isolated reports in Latin America show a prevalence of 17-33% in the general population, similar to that of the rest of the world,20,39,40 describing an increase to 44% in patients with overweight and obesity that underwent liver biopsy.38 In Mexico, the reported prevalence of MAFLD varies, depending on the population studied and the methodology employed for its detection. At the beginning of the year 2000, prevalence was reported at 4.6-15.7% in population studies,16–19 whereas through conventional ultrasound imaging, prevalence was 28.65% in subjects above 18 years of age.20,21 Recently, in a population study conducted by Bernal-Reyes et al. that included 585 individuals above 18 years of age from different regions of Mexico, prevalence was 42.1%.22

On the other hand, gallstone disease has a high prevalence worldwide, estimated to present in 8 to 11% of the adult population. The highest incidence is in White adults (8-15%) in reports from Austria, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States, describing approximately 600,000 new cases annually; incidence is intermediate (3-8%) in the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Ireland, Norway, and New Zealand; and incidence is low (0.8-3%) in Blacks and in Asian countries.39,40 Rates in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile have been reported to be similar to those in the United States, and prevalence in Latin America, including Mexico, is 5-15%.41–44 In the present study, 70.59% of the patients with gallstone disease had histologic alterations characterized as MAFLD and 29.41% had normal liver, which are higher figures than those reported in population studies or ultrasound findings. They are also higher than the results of a similar study conducted by Ramos-de la Medina et al. in 2008 that reported gallstones in only 45% of the cases.32 Likewise, steatosis was the predominant clinical disease, presenting in 52.21% of the patients, whereas 15.44% of the cases corresponded to steatohepatitis, and 2.94% to cirrhosis (Table 3).

In a meta-analysis conducted in 2016, Shabanzadeh et al. established the fact that there are risk factors implicit in gallstone disease that are difficult to modify, such as age, predominance of female sex over male sex (at a ratio of 4.3:1), and genetic alterations in indigenous groups in the United States and Eastern Asia.45–47 In our group of patients with gallstone disease, the mean age was 54.08±14.7 years, higher than the 43.10±13.86 years of age of the patients with normal weight (95% CI: 48.23-53.47 and p=0.0000). There was a predominance of women (79.4%) over men (20.6%) The majority of women were married (77.9%) and were housewives (54.4%). High blood pressure, diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and multiparity,48–52 as well as gallbladder stasis and bacterial permeation,53–56 were associated with gallbladder disease.

In our study, approximately 90% of the patients diagnosed with MAFLD had at least one of the components of metabolic syndrome and 30% met 3 of its diagnostic criteria, conferring upon that group an 11-times higher risk for presenting with obesity, type 2 diabetes, and high blood pressure, compared with the normal weight patients (p<0.05). Even though hypertriglyceridemia and multiparity were also higher in that group, they did not reach statistical significance, similar to that reported in the international literature. In relation to the frequency of MAFLD with sex, it was higher in women (74 cases, 77.08%) than in men (22 cases, 22.92%), (p=0.168).

In the initial phases of MAFLD, the clinical data are scarce and nonspecific, and its diagnosis tends to be incidental, upon finding elevated aminotransferases or minimal changes identified through conventional ultrasound and liver function tests. Therefore, the 2019 Mexican Consensus on NAFLD by the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología and the Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología recommend their performance as screening methods directed at the high-risk population, in particular, patients with one or more components of metabolic syndrome.57 In our case series the AST values in the healthy liver were 25.00±11.24 μ/l (95% CI: 21.40-28.60) vs. 32.95±18.34 μ/l (95% CI: 29.23-36.66) in MAFLD (p=0.001), and the ALT values were 33.17±23.39u/l (95% CI: 21.40-28.60) vs. 59.23±38.28 μ/l (95% CI: 51.47-66.99), respectively (p=0.000). Conventional ultrasound had moderate concordance for detecting steatosis in our series.

The biochemical profile of lipids and liver function tests in the patients with MAFLD showed significantly higher levels of glucose, triglycerides, and alkaline phosphatase, compared with the patients with normal liver (p<0.05), whereas the levels of direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, total protein, and albumin showed no statistical significance between the two groups.

In our study, ultrasound imaging had a concordance of 42.6% with the abnormal liver and a total level of concordance of 0.71, p0.000, with a kappa index of 0.41 and a 95% CI of 0.29-0.59, which we considered moderate, in relation to the histopathologic findings.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated an elevated prevalence of MAFLD in patients that presented with cholelithiasis between the fourth and sixth decades of life, and even though there were a majority of women in the MAFLD and normal liver groups, the risk for gallstone disease was slightly predominant in men.

MAFLD and gallstone disease share risk factors and biochemical behavior, such as components of metabolic syndrome.

Even though liver biopsy is not exempt from morbidity and mortality, the possibility of bleeding and the need for its control under direct vision is reduced to a minimum. Therefore, we believe that the surgical treatment of cholelithiasis can be performed simultaneously with liver biopsy, given that the surgical procedure is safe, efficacious, and relatively inexpensive and liver biopsy is the gold standard in diagnosing MAFLD.

Financial disclosure

The study was carried out utilizing funds from the participating institutions.

Conflict of interest

Dr. José María Remes Troche is a consultant and speaker for the Asofarma and Takeda laboratories.

The rest of the authors have no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
N. Chalasani, Z. Younossi, J.E. Lavine, et al.
The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association.
Hepatology, 55 (2012), pp. 2005-2023
[2]
Z. Younossi, Q.M. Anstee, M. Marietti, et al.
Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 15 (2018), pp. 11-20
[3]
Z.M. Younossi.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - A global public health perspective.
J Hepatol, 70 (2019), pp. 531-544
[4]
M. Povsic, O. Yee-Wong, R. Perry, et al.
A structured literature review of the epidemiology and disease burden of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).
Adv Ther, 36 (2019), pp. 1574-1594
[5]
M. Eslam, A.J. Sanyal, J. George, et al.
MAFLD: A consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease.
[6]
Y. Eguchi, G. Wong, E.I. Lee, et al.
Epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in Japan: A focused literature review.
JGH Open, 4 (2020), pp. 808-817
[7]
D.L. White, F. Kanwal, H.B. El‐Serag.
Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk for hepatocellular cancer, based on systematic review.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10 (2012),
[8]
C. Estes, Q.M. Anstee, M.T. Arias‐Loste, et al.
Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016–2030.
J. Hepatol, 69 (2018), pp. 896-904
[9]
V. Bullón-Vela, I. Abete, M.A. Zulet, et al.
Factores de riesgo asociados diferencialmente con la enfermedad del hígado graso no alcohólico en hombres y mujeres con síndrome metabólico.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig, 112 (2020), pp. 94-100
[10]
L. Caballería, G. Pera, M.A. Auladell, et al.
Prevalence and factors associated with the presence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in an adult population in Spain.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 22 (2010), pp. 24-32
[11]
R.J. Wong, J.M. Aguilar, R. Cheung, et al.
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States.
Gastroenterology, 148 (2015), pp. 547-555
[12]
P. Briseño-Bass, R. Chávez-Pérez, M. López-Zendejas.
Prevalencia y relación de esteatosis hepática con perfil lipídico y hepático en pacientes de chequeo médico.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 84 (2019), pp. 290-295
[13]
J. Lizardi-Cervera, I. Becerra-Laparra, N. Chávez-Tapia, et al.
Prevalencia de hígado graso no alcohólico y síndrome metabólico en población asintomática.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 71 (2006), pp. 453-459
[14]
M.G. Castro-Martínez, D.Z. Banderas-Lares, J.C. Ramírez-Martínez, et al.
Prevalencia de hígado graso no alcohólico en individuos con síndrome metabólico.
Cir Cir, 80 (2012), pp. 128-133
[15]
L. Uscanga-Domínguez, M.V. Bielsa-Fernández, F. Huerta-Iga, et al.
L: Guías clínicas de diagnóstico y tratamiento de hepatopatía grasa no alcohólica. Generalidades.
Rev Gstroenterol Mex, 73 (2008), pp. 128-144
[16]
R. Bernal-Reyes, A. Sáenz-Labra, R. Bernardo-Escudero.
Prevalencia de la esteatohepatitis no alcohólica (EHNA). Estudio comparativo con diabéticos.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 65 (2000), pp. 58-62
[17]
E. Álvarez-Martínez, E. Pérez-Campos, P. Leyva-Bohórques.
Prevalencia de esteatohepatitis no alcohólica en adultos con síndrome metabólico en Oaxaca.
Gac Med Mex, 141 (2005), pp. 7
[18]
F. Roesch-Dietlen, A. Dorantes-Cuéllar, M. Carrillo-Toledo, et al.
Frecuencia de hígado grado no alcohólico en un grupo de pacientes con síndrome metabólico estudiado en la ciudad de Veracruz.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 71 (2006), pp. 446-452
[19]
C.A. Aguilar-Salinas, R. Rojas, F.J. Gómez-Pérez, et al.
High prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Mexico.
Arch Med Res, 35 (2004), pp. 76-81
[20]
J.A. López-Velázquez, K.V. Silva-Vidal, G. Ponciano-Rodríguez, et al.
The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the Americas.
Ann Hepatol, 13 (2014), pp. 166-178
[21]
M.J. Ortega-Chavarría, G. Cornelio-Rodríguez, F. Rodríguez-Weber, et al.
Prevalencia del hígado graso no alcohólico y su asociación con alteraciones bioquímicas en una población mexicana asintomática.
Acta Médica Grupo Ángeles, 18 (2020), pp. 127-132
[22]
J.M. Bernal-Reyes, L.A. Remes-Troche, M. Chi-Cervera, et al.
Prevalencia y características clínico-epidemiológicas de una población mexicana con MAFLD (Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease): un estudio en población abierta.
Rev Gastroenterol México, 85 (2020), pp. 13-14
[23]
A.F. Attili, N. Carulli, E. Roda, et al.
Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Italy: prevalence data of the Multicenter Italian Study on Cholelithiasis (M.I.COL.).
Am J Epidemiol, 141 (1995), pp. 158-165
[24]
A. Cremer, M. Arvanitakis.
Diagnosis and management of bile stone disease and its complications.
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol, 62 (2016), pp. 103-129
[25]
A. Di Ciaula, D.Q. Wang, P. Portincasa.
Cholesterol cholelithiasis: part of a systemic metabolic disease, prone to primary prevention.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 13 (2019), pp. 157-171
[26]
M. Hamaguchi, T. Kojima, N. Takeda, et al.
The metabolic syndrome as a predictor of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
[27]
N. Salva-Pastor, N.C. Chávez-Tapia, M. Uribe, et al.
The diagnostic and initial approach of the patient with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: role of the primary care provider.
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench, 12 (2019), pp. 267-277
[28]
N. Méndez-Sánchez, M. Arrese, A. Gadano, et al.
The Latin American Association for the Study of the Liver (ALEH) position statement on the redefinition of fatty liver disease.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 6 (2021), pp. 65-72
[29]
K.B. Khaw, R.H. Choi, J.H. Kam, et al.
Interval increase in the prevalence of symptomatic cholelithiasis-associated non-alcoholic fatty liver disease over a ten-year period in an Asian population.
Singapore Med J, 58 (2017), pp. 703-707
[30]
K. Singh, D. Dahiya, L. Kaman, et al.
Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hypercholesterolemia in patients with gallstone disease undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Pol Przegl Chir, 15 (2019), pp. 18-22
[31]
N. Méndez-Sánchez, M. Uribe-Esquivel, J. Jessurun-Solomou, et al.
Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Mexico.
Rev Invest Clin, 42 (1990), pp. 48-52
[32]
A. Ramos-de la Medina, J.M. Remes-Troche, F. Roesch-Dietlen, et al.
Routine liver biopsy to screen for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) during cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: is it justified?.
J Gastrointest Surg, 12 (2008), pp. 2097-2102
[33]
D.E. Kleiner, E.M. Brunt, M. Van-Natta, et al.
Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hepatology, 41 (2005), pp. 1313-1321
[34]
Z.A. Sherif, A. Saeed, S. Ghavimi, et al.
Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and perspectives on US minority populations.
Dig Dis Sci, 61 (2016), pp. 1214-1225
[35]
N.E. Rich, S. Oji, A.R. Mufti, et al.
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Prevalence, Severity, and Outcomes in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 16 (2018),
[36]
N. Chalasani, Z. Younossi, J.E. Lavine, et al.
The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology.
Gastroenterology, 142 (2012), pp. 1592-1609
[37]
EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Diabetology, 59 (2016), pp. 1121-2114
[38]
Z.M. Younossi, A.B. Koenig, D. Abdelatif, et al.
Global epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence and outcomes.
Hepatology, 64 (2016), pp. 73-84
[39]
S.T. Song, J. Shi, X.H. Wang, et al.
Prevalence and risk factors for gallstone disease: A population-based cross-sectional study.
J Dig Dis, 21 (2020), pp. 237-245
[40]
L.M. Stinton, R.P. Myers, E.A. Shaffer.
Epidemiology of gallstones.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 39 (2010), pp. 157-169
[41]
N. Méndez-Sánchez, J. Jessurun, G. Ponciano-Rodríguez, et al.
Prevalence of gallstone disease in Mexico. A necropsy study.
Digest Dis Scienc, 38 (1993), pp. 680-683
[42]
U. Martínez-Acosta, J. Arzabe-Quiroga, I. Zamorano-Vicente, et al.
Incidencia de colelitiasis.
Universidad de Aquino Bolivia, Facultad de Medicina, (2005),
[43]
C.L. Armora-Carbonell, Y. Arteaga-Prado, T. Plaza-González, et al.
Diagnóstico clínico y epidemiológico de la litiasis vesicular.
[44]
C. González-Villalpando, D. Rivera-Martínez, B. Arredondo-Pérez, et al.
High prevalence of cholelithiasis in a low income Mexican population: an ultrasonographic survey.
Arch Med Res, 28 (1997), pp. 543-547
[45]
N. Kumar, S. Bansal, S. Gupta, B.L. Yadav, et al.
Association of metabolic syndrome with complicated gall stone disease: our experience.
Int Surg J, 6 (2019), pp. 2543-2547
[46]
D.M. Shabanzadeh, L.T. Sorensen, T. Jorgensen.
Determinants for gallstone formation - a new data cohort study and a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Scand J Gastroenterol, 51 (2016), pp. 1239-1248
[47]
R.E. Sampliner, P.H. Bennett, L.J. Comers, et al.
Gallbladder disease in Pima Indians. Demonstration of high prevalence and early onset by cholecystography.
N Engl J Med, 283 (1970), pp. 1358-1364
[48]
Q. Gu, G. Zhou, T. Xu.
Risk factors for gallstone disease in Shanghai: An observational study.
[49]
P. Montes-Teves.
Non alcoholic fatty liver: a growing epidemic.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru, 36 (2016), pp. 195-196
[50]
A.M. Tagle, M.L. Poggi, G.N. Ferrari, et al.
Hallazgos clínicos, bioquímicos y de histología hepática en adultos peruanos con sobrepeso y obesidad: primer estudio prospectivo nacional.
Rev Gastroenterol Perú, 28 (2008), pp. 323-331
[51]
K. Liu, G.W. McCaughan.
Epidemiology and etiologic associations of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and associated HCC.
Adv Exp Med Biol, 1061 (2018), pp. 3-18
[52]
R. Kumar, R.N. Priyadarshi, U. Anand.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Growing burden, adverse outcomes and associations.
J Clin Transl Hepatol, 28 (2020), pp. 76-86
[53]
Z.M. Younossi, P. Golabi, L. de Ávila, et al.
The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Hepatol, 71 (2019), pp. 793-801
[54]
W.H. Admirand, D.M. Small.
The physico-chemical basis of cholesterol gallstone formation in man.
J Clin Invest, 47 (1968), pp. 1043-1052
[55]
I.G. Castro-Torres, I.B. Bermúdez-Camps.
Fisiopatología de cálculos biliares de colesterol: la búsqueda de una diana terapéutica.
Rev Biomed, 26 (2015), pp. 13-87
[56]
M. Rudling, A. Laskar, S. Straniero.
Gallbladder bile supersaturated with cholesterol in gallstone patients preferentially develops from shortage of bile acids.
J Lipid Research, 60 (2019), pp. 498-505
[57]
R. Bernal-Reyes, G. Castro-Narro, R. Malé-Velázquez, et al.
Consenso mexicano de la enfermedad por hígado graso no alcohólico.
Rev Mex Gastroenterol, 84 (2019), pp. 69-99

Please cite this article as: Roesch-Dietlen F, Pérez-Morales AG, Grube-Pagola P, González-Santes M, Díaz-Roesch F, Triana-Romero A, Roesch-Ramos L, Remes-Troche JM, Cruz-Aguilar M. Prevalencia de la esteatosis hepática metabólica (EHMet) en pacientes con litiasis vesicular. Estudio de una cohorte de casos en el sur-sureste de México. Rev Gastroenterol Méx. 2023;88:225–231.

Copyright © 2022. Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología
Idiomas
Revista de Gastroenterología de México
Article options
Tools
es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.