Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 83. Num. 1.January - March 2018
Pages 1-76
Visits
557
Vol. 83. Num. 1.January - March 2018
Pages 1-76
Scientific letter
DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2017.05.006
Gastric glomangioma, differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Glomangioma gástrico, diagnóstico diferencial de tumores del estroma gastrointestinal
Visits
557
E. Rosales-Lópeza, J.C. Salceda-Oteroa,b,
Corresponding author
carlossalceda@yahoo.com

Corresponding author. Centro Médico ABC, Observatorio, Sur 136, Número 116, Colonia Las Américas, Mexico City, Mexico. Tel.: +5272 49 19.
, D. Angulo-Molinaa, J.A. Posada-Torresc, M.G. Canchola-Aguilard, D. Lozoya-Gonzaleza
a Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service, Centro Médico ABC, Mexico City, Mexico
b Endoscopic Ultrasound, Centro Médico ABC, Mexico City, Mexico
c Oncologic Surgery, Centro Médico ABC, Mexico City, Mexico
d Pathology Service, Centro Médico ABC, Mexico City, Mexico
This item has received
557
Visits
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

Glomus tumors originate from smooth muscle cells of the glomus bodies that help regulate arteriolar flow. They are mesenchymal tumors with malignant potential.1 Though infrequent, malignant gastric glomus tumors with metastasis to different organs have been reported.2

A 52-year-old man presented with intermittent abdominal pain in the epigastrium of several months’ progression, with partial response to medical treatment. He did not complain of fever, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, weight loss, or any other systemic symptomatology. Physical examination revealed normal vital signs and no cardiopulmonary alterations. He had pain in the upper hemiabdomen upon deep palpation, no peritoneal irritation, and no other pathologic signs.

Endoscopy showed an ulcerated subepithelial tumor in the posterior wall of the gastric antrum. No abnormalities in the gastric mucosa were reported in the endoscopic biopsy. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) identified a 3 x 2.5cm nodular, hypoechogenic, heterogeneous tumor located in the muscular layer of the gastric wall, through Doppler imaging, with interior vascularity. The EUS data were consistent with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (fig. 1).

Figure 1.
(0.13MB).

A) Endoscopic view. Subepithelial tumor in the posterior wall of the gastric antrum with ulceration of the mucosa. B) Endosonographic view. A 3 x 2.5cm nodular, hypoechogenic, heterogeneous tumor located in the muscular layer of the gastric wall (red arrow).

Computed axial tomography was performed and distant disease was ruled out. Based on these findings, the tumor was surgically resected.

The macroscopic pathology study reported a 3.5 x 2.3cm nodular tumor between the serous and muscular layers, with focal ulceration of the mucosal surface. Microscopically, through hematoxylin/eosin staining, a proliferation of small-to-intermediate-sized round cells was observed, with central nuclei and dense granular chromatin. The immunohistochemical analysis (fig. 2) revealed positive staining for smooth muscle actin (SMA), intense h-Caldesmon, and focal expression of synaptophysin. Staining was negative for CD117, DOG1, CD56, PGP9.5, and chromogranin. Ki-67 was positive in 3% of the tumor cells. Because of the immunophenotype, the diagnosis was glomus tumor, ruling out epithelioid GIST and neuroendocrine tumor, both of which are histologic differential diagnoses of glomus tumor. The patient was released on the third day with no complications. At the follow-up 6 months after discharge, the patient was asymptomatic and only post-resection changes were observed at endoscopy, along with normal mucosa and no tumor recurrence.

Figure 2.
(0.62MB).

A) Comprehensive image of the intramural lesion. B and C) Round, uniform cells with central oval nuclei, homogeneous granular chromatin, clearly delineated and eosinophilic small nucleolus of the cytoplasm. D) Immunohistochemistry positive for smooth muscle actin. E) Immunohistochemistry positive for synaptophysin in perivascular glomus cells.

Described in 1948 by De Busscher, glomus tumors were considered benign lesions,3 but today they are regarded as mesenchymal tumors with malignant potential.1

In 2001, Folpe et al. proposed the following criteria for suspecting malignancy: location of the tumor in the deep layers, size larger than 2cm, and histologically, atypical mitotic figures with a moderate-to-high nuclear grade, with more than 5 mitoses per 50 high power fields.4 If a gastric tumor is larger than 5cm, malignancy can be suspected.5

Preoperative diagnosis of glomus tumors is difficult because of their similarity to GISTs and neuroendocrine tumors in CAT, magnetic resonance (MR), and endoscopic ultrasound imaging studies.6 Radiologically, glomus tumors present as submucosal masses, with or without ulcers, and can contain small calcifications.1,7 Diagnosis based on EUS is presumptive and cannot replace histologic diagnosis.

An alternative that has been shown to be useful in the preoperative diagnosis of submucosal gastric tumors is EUS-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy.8 Given that in 52-93% of the cases it is possible to obtain a sufficient amount of tissue for staining tests, as well as for immunohistochemical analysis, this biopsy is considered essential for the preoperative diagnosis of gastric glomus tumors.6,9

Histopathologically, glomus tumor cells are small, uniform, round or polygonal, with very visible cell membranes.10 Diagnosing and differentiating this tumor from other gastric tumors can most certainly be based on immunohistochemical study. Glomus tumors are positive for smooth muscle actin (SMA), calponin, and h-Caldesmon and negative for desmin, and thus can be differentiated from GISTs.5

Optimum treatment is surgical resection, when there is a single tumor.1 In the case of our patient, the tumor was surgically resected. However, some cases can be managed through endoscopic submucosal resection.11,12

Financial disclosure

No financial support was received in relation to this study/article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
K.B. Chen,L. Chen
Glomus tumor in the stomach: A case report and review of the literature
Oncol Lett, 7 (2014), pp. 1790-1792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.1986
[2]
S.E. Song,C.H. Lee,K.A. Kim
Malignant glomus tumor of the stomach with multiorgan metastases: Report of a case
Surg Today, 40 (2010), pp. 662-667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-4113-z
[3]
G. De Busscher
Les anatomoses arterioveineuses de l’estomac: An ultraestructural study
Acta Neurol Morphol, 6 (1948), pp. 87-105
[4]
A.L. Folpe,J.C. Fanburg-Smith,M. Miettinen
Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: Analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors
Am J Surg Pathol, 25 (2001), pp. 1-12
[5]
M. Miettinen,E. Paal,J. Lasota
Gastrointestinal glomus tumors: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 32 cases
Am J Surg Pathol, 26 (2002), pp. 301-311
[6]
S. Kato,K. Kikuchi,K. Chinen
Diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for glomus tumor of the stomach
World J Gastroenterol, 21 (2015), pp. 7052-7058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.7052
[7]
M. Tang,J. Hou,D. Wu
Glomus tumor in the stomach: Computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound findings
World J Gastroenterol, 19 (2013), pp. 1327-1329 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i8.1327
[8]
M.A. Mekky,K. Yamao,A. Sawaki
Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors
Gastrointest Endosc, 71 (2010), pp. 913-919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.044
[9]
K. Akahoshi,M. Oya,T. Koga
Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 2cm
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 23 (2014), pp. 405-412
[10]
X.D. Xu,X.H. Lu,G.X. Ye
Immunohistochemical analysis and biological behaviour of gastric glomus tumours: A case report and review of the literature
J Int Med Res, 38 (2010), pp. 1539-1546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800438
[11]
Y. Zhang,P. Zhou,M. Xu
Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of gastric glomus tumors
Gastrointest Endosc, 73 (2011), pp. 371-375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.023
[12]
M. Xu,X.M. Jiang,Y.L. He
Glomus tumor of the stomach: A case treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 35 (2011), pp. 325-328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2010.11.006

Please cite this article as: Rosales-López E, Salceda-Otero JC, Angulo-Molina D, Posada-Torres JA, Canchola-Aguilar MG, Lozoya-Gonzalez D. Glomangioma gástrico, diagnóstico diferencial de tumores del estroma gastrointestinal. Revista de Gastroenterología de México. 2018;83:72–74.

Copyright © 2017. Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología
Idiomas
Revista de Gastroenterología de México

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.